Measured per class
Precision and recall reported per defect or document type, so you know exactly where the model is strong and where humans stay in the loop.
Detection, OCR and quality inspection trained on your images, tested in your lighting, deployed on your line or in your cloud.
Vision models fail in the gap between the demo dataset and your factory floor: glare, dust, camera angles, the defect that shows up twice a month. We build detection, OCR and quality-inspection systems around that gap, training on your images and evaluating on the hard cases your team collects, not on benchmark photos.
The engagement starts with your existing footage, or a capture plan if there is none. We label a first dataset, train a baseline and show you precision and recall per defect class within weeks. From there the loop is tight: review the misses together, relabel, retrain, until the numbers clear the bar you set.
Deployment fits your constraints: edge devices next to the camera when latency or connectivity demands it, cloud when it does not. The system ships with a review UI for borderline cases, so operators correct the model and every correction becomes training data for the next iteration. Retraining on that growing set is a scheduled pipeline, not a new project.
Precision and recall reported per defect or document type, so you know exactly where the model is strong and where humans stay in the loop.
Trained and tested on your cameras, lighting and materials. The eval set is built from your worst cases, not clean samples.
ONNX-exported models run on devices at the line or as GPU services in your cloud, chosen by latency and cost.
Stamps, handwriting, skewed scans and multi-language documents, with confidence scores routing the doubtful ones to people.
Labeling standards and tooling mean every production correction grows your dataset and your accuracy over time.
Audit existing images or plan the capture, then label a first dataset with class definitions your operators agree on.
A first model within weeks, scored per class, so we know early whether data or modeling is the bottleneck.
Review errors with your domain experts, expand the dataset where it hurts and retrain until targets are met.
Optimize and package for edge or cloud, wire in monitoring and the human review loop, then hand over.
With modern pretrained backbones, a few hundred per class is often enough for a first baseline, and augmentation stretches small sets further. The feasibility study answers it precisely: we train on what you have and report where more data would pay off.
Yes, with the right approach: augmentation, synthetic examples and anomaly detection that flags anything unusual rather than only known classes. Recall on rare cases is reported separately, so the risk stays visible.
Yes. Models export to ONNX and run on industrial PCs or edge devices next to the camera, with updates shipped on your schedule and no cloud dependency at inference time.
Send a sample of your footage and we will tell you what accuracy is realistic before you commit.
Scope a vision pilot